Quality of essential drugs in tropical countries: evaluation of antimalarial drugs in the Brazilian Health System.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of drug resistance is one of the main problems concerning malaria treatment. The use of counterfeit and/or substandard antimalarial drugs can contribute to the development of parasite resistance. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of antimalarial drugs distributed in Brazil. METHODS: Samples containing chloroquine phosphate, mefloquine hydrochloride, primaquine phosphate, and quinine sulfate tablets were delivered to the Rio de Janeiro central storeroom (CENADI), state storerooms (SS), and Basic Health Units (BHUs) in the north region of Brazil - a total of 10 sample sets. After 5 months of storage, the samples were collected, and in vitro quality control analyses according to official and published methods were performed. RESULTS: Inadequate drug storage conditions were found in two SS and in all BHUs evaluated. There were no quality deviations found in the chloroquine samples. The quinine samples exhibited weight variation above the allowed limits. The primaquine samples were found to have packaging deficiency. The release of mefloquine in samples from some regions showed a statistically significant difference when compared with the CENADI samples. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to periodically evaluate the quality and storage conditions of essential drugs. The quality deviations found with the primaquine and quinine samples are not related to storage conditions and must be addressed urgently. The decreased mefloquine release from tablets is related to formulation problems or influenced by inadequate storage conditions, prompting further investigation. Even with the mentioned problems, the samples would probably not contribute to resistant parasite selection.

Quality of essential drugs in tropical countries: evaluation of antimalarial drugs in the Brazilian Health System / Qualidade de medicamentos essenciais em países tropicais: avaliação de medicamentos antimaláricos no Sistema de Saúde do Brasil

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of drug resistance is one of the main problems concerning malaria treatment. The use of counterfeit and/or substandard antimalarial drugs can contribute to the development of parasite resistance. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of antimalarial drugs distributed in Brazil. METHODS: Samples containing chloroquine phosphate, mefloquine hydrochloride, primaquine phosphate, and quinine sulfate tablets were delivered to the Rio de Janeiro central storeroom (CENADI), state storerooms (SS), and Basic Health Units (BHUs) in the north region of Brazil - a total of 10 sample sets. After 5 months of storage, the samples were collected, and in vitro quality control analyses according to official and published methods were performed. RESULTS: Inadequate drug storage conditions were found in two SS and in all BHUs evaluated. There were no quality deviations found in the chloroquine samples. The quinine samples exhibited weight variation above the allowed limits. The primaquine samples were found to have packaging deficiency. The release of mefloquine in samples from some regions showed a statistically significant difference when compared with the CENADI samples. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to periodically evaluate the quality and storage conditions of essential drugs. The quality deviations found with the primaquine and quinine samples are not related to storage conditions and must be addressed urgently. The decreased mefloquine release from tablets is related to formulation problems or influenced by inadequate storage conditions, prompting further investigation. Even with the mentioned problems, the samples would probably not contribute to resistant parasite selection.

INTRODUÇÃO: O aparecimento de resistência aos medicamentos é um dos maiores problemas do tratamento da malária. O uso de medicamentos falsos e/ou de má qualidade pode contribuir para o desenvolvimento de resistência no parasita. Este estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a qualidade dos medicamentos antimaláricos distribuídos no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Amostras contendo comprimidos de difosfato de cloroquina, cloridrato de mefloquina, difosfato de primaquina e sulfato de quinina foram enviadas ao almoxarifado central na Cidade do Rio de Janeiro (CENADI), almoxarifados estaduais (SS) e Unidades Básicas de Saúde (UBS) nos estados da região norte do Brasil, totalizando dez amostras. Após cinco meses de armazenamento, as amostras foram coletadas e analisadas segundo métodos oficiais e da literatura. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas condições inadequadas de armazenamento de medicamentos em duas SS e em todas as UBS avaliadas. Não foram encontrados problemas de qualidade com as amostras de cloroquina. As amostras de quinina apresentaram variação de peso acima dos limites permitidos. Amostras de primaquina foram encontradas com problemas na embalagem. A cedência de mefloquina de comprimidos, em algumas regiões, apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa quando comparada com a amostra do CENADI. CONCLUSÕES: É importante avaliar, periodicamente, a qualidade e as condições de armazenamento de medicamentos essenciais. Desvios de qualidade encontrados com as amostras de primaquina e quinina não estão relacionados às condições de armazenamento e devem ser corrigidos urgentemente. O decréscimo na cedência de mefloquina dos comprimidos está relacionado com a formulação ou foi influenciada por condições de armazenamento inadequadas, necessitando de uma investigação posterior. Apesar dos problemas mencionados, as amostras provavelmente não contribuiriam para a seleção de parasitas resistentes.

Fake antimalarials in Southeast Asia are a major impediment to malaria control: multinational cross-sectional survey on the prevalence of fake antimalarials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of counterfeit antimalarial drugs in Southeast (SE) Asia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Pharmacies and shops selling antimalarial drugs in Myanmar (Burma), Lao PDR, Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of artemisinin derivatives or mefloquine containing drugs of substandard quality. RESULTS: Of the 188 tablet packs purchased which were labelled as 'artesunate' 53% did not contain any artesunate. All counterfeit artesunate tablets were labelled as manufactured by 'Guilin Pharma', and refinements of the fake blisterpacks made them often hard to distinguish from their genuine counterparts. No other artemisinin derivatives were found to be counterfeited. Of the 44 mefloquine samples, 9% contained <10% of the expected amount of active ingredient. CONCLUSIONS: An alarmingly high proportion of antimalarial drugs bought in pharmacies and shops in mainland SE Asia are counterfeit, and the problem has increased significantly compared with our previous survey in 1999-2000. This is a serious threat to public health in the region.

Efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose mefloquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination compared with chloroquine in the treatment of acute malaria infection in a population with multiple drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

The efficacy and tolerability of single, low-dose mefloquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (MSP) combination was compared with chloroquine (CQ) for malaria treatment in a malaria-endemic area of Nigeria with multiple drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The two drug regimens (MSP and CQ) were tested in a 12-month prospective population study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated presumptively, based on malaria symptoms. Group 2 patients were treated based on a parasitologic diagnosis using the World Health Organization seven-day in vivo test and extended to a 28-day follow-up period. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence and intensity of adverse events. One thousand nine hundred thirty-five patients visiting 10 health facilities, including the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, were enrolled. The study showed that the low-dose MSP was efficacious, with day 7 response rates of 95% and 91% for (presumptive) Group 1 and (in vivo) Group 2, respectively, while CQ had day 7 response rates of 82% and 66% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The low-dose MSP was significantly (P < 0.0001) more efficacious, with faster fever and parasite clearance times than CQ in this area of CQ-resistant P. falciparum malaria. Eight patients treated with CQ, including seven severe cases (RII-RIII) were successfully re-treated with MSP. Adverse events were generally more common among those treated with MSP (29%) than those treated with CQ (17%). However, the adverse events caused by both drugs were mild to moderate and self-limited. The MSP combination appears to be a good substitute for CQ, in view of multiple drug resistance, especially in areas with severe (RII-RIII) malaria.